In any python API documentation, why are optional arguments written in a nested style? -


This is just why:

  Find ([spec = none [, Fields = none [, leave = 0 [, boundary = 0 [, timeout = true [, snapshot = fault], readable = false [, sort = none [, max_scan = none [, escape = none] [, Slave_ok = lie], wait_data = false [, partial = wrong [, manipher = true], read_preview = redrepresentation. Primary [, exit = wrong [, compilation_re = true [, quark]]]]]]]]]]] ]]]]]]]]               

I have no authentic source to return my statement Alternative alternative arguments presented in

will apply the proper sequence of a nested style field.

In the module for example

  os.fdopen (fd [, mode [, Bufsize]])   

indicates that mode and bufsize is optional but if you are specifying bufsize, then you should specify mode.

For keyword logic, on the other hand, a default value is assigned to the order without any order, this value is optional

  split (string, maxsplit = 0 )      ex>  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ios - Adding an SKSpriteNode to SKScene from a child SKSpriteNode -

Matlab transpose a table vector -

c# - Textbox not clickable but editable -