julia lang - Function signature not found despite showing with methods(...) -

-

I am new to Julia, so it can be trivial.

I have a function definition that looks the module (using URI pcizer): 

  add function (graph :: graph, subject: URI, prediction :: URI, Object :: URI ... and   
 Out of the module, I call:  
 Add ! (G, UriPerser. URI ("http://test.org/1"), URIPerser.URI ("http://test.org/2"), URIIPRSURUR ("http://test.org/1" ))   
 gives me this error:  
  Error: Add any method (graph, URI, URI, URI) in boot.jl There are: 238 included_in_fom_net1 loading.jl: 114 a / users / jabran / src / rdf / src / rdf.jl: 79   
 Strange because when I can see Milan's signature:  
  julia & gt; Methods (RDF.add!) # 4 methods for the generic function "Add!": Addition (Graph :: Graph, Subject: URI, Prediction :: URI, Object :: Number) / User / Forcibly / src / RDF Add /src/RDF.jl29! (Article :: Graph, subject: URI, Uniform :: URI, Object :: String) / Add User / Jarbar / SRC / RDF / SRC / RDF.JL 36! User / Jarbar / SRC / RDF / SRC / RDFJL04 (Graph :: Graph, Subject: URI, Forecast :: URI, Object :: URI) First of all I thought that this was my purpose: Add / User / Journer / SRC / RDF / SRC / RDF.JL: 68 on the Add (Graph :: Graph, Statement :: Statement) : The Association (...) was used, but even when I define three functions with numbers, strings, and URI, I get this error.  
 Is anything clear that I am missing?  
 Thanks, = "Post-text" itemprop = "text"> 
 It seems that the method  extension  and between  shadowing  Only a little bit of difference can be a bit.  
 There is a shortage here when you add the  function! (:: Graph, ...) writes; One ?? |; the ending; , Julia  simply  looks at your local area and sees if  add! If it is defined, it will expand that function with this new method signing. But if it is not already locally defined, Julia has created a new local variable  add! For that function.  has been created.  
 As JMW's comments show, I'm sure you have  two  add free !  Function  Base.add!  and  RDF.add! . In your RDF module, you  Base.add!  is to hide the definition of how it can do the actual  Base.pi  without affecting a local variable  pi = 3  without affecting in other scope. But in this case, you have your methods  Base.add! Want to merge with the  function and many Dispatches want to take care of the resolution.  
 There are two ways to get the method Extension behavior:  
     
  1.  
     Within your  module RDF , say  import base : Add!  Clearly  Base.add! Add  to your local area! , the method allows extension.   
  2.  
     Clearly base.add the  function as your method! (Graph :: graph, one ??).  I like this form because this definition documents your intentions more clearly to expand the  base  function on the site.    
     This can certainly be a better document. There is a brief reference to this in this section, and it should be merged in the future which will help.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ios - Adding an SKSpriteNode to SKScene from a child SKSpriteNode -

-
I have a SKScene where I am adding an SKSpriteNode I have subclassed the SKSpriteNode class to create this node. In the subclass I am defining some SKActions on Sprite. What do I want to do when the end of this phantom ends the SKAction sequence, then I add a new Prayer node to this scene. How is this possible. The following code is mine: The code for the sequence is that I'm running on the Scansprinitode subclass (TEMissileNode): - SKAction * moveDown = [SKAction moveToY: Self.position.y - 20 Duration: 0.2]; SKAction * animation = [SKAction animateWithTextures: textures timePerFrame: time / 7]; SKAction * moveMissileProjectile = [SKAction Moving: Pointoffscreen Term: Time]; SKAction * group = [SKAction group: @ [animation, movement projectile]]; SKAction * Sequence = [SKAction Sequence: @ [Hilldown, Group, [SKAction removalFromParent]]]; [Self run action: sequence]; From the main scene, I call those actions that execute these tasks TEMissileNode * missile = [tmissil...
Read more

Matlab transpose a table vector -

-
An embarrassing simple question seems to be, but how can I move a Matlab table vector? aTableT = aTable '; I tried a standard syntax for the simple interaction of a line vector to a line vector aTable : ATableT = reshape (aTable, 1, Height (aTable)); and aTableT = rot90 (aTable); According to the head, the last time table should work for table, see. However, I get this error code: Error type in using table / permit (line 396) Undefined function 'permute' for the input arguments. Error in rot 90 (line 29) b = magnitude (b, [2 1 3: ndims (a)]); NB: fliplr is not useful either pretty sure I have covered clear angles - any ideas? Thanks! Try changing your table into an array, move it, then back to a table In other words, try doing this: aTableArray = table2array (aTable); ATableT = array 2table (aTableArray. '); I have also read the document for rot90 , and it says that rot90 is definitely working for tables Do, and I find you...
Read more

c# - Textbox not clickable but editable -

-
I have a small form with 10 text boxes, I have set them in the correct tab order. I want them on my tab service I was wondering if there is a way to set the text box so that they can be selected for editing until they are tabbed. That is ... I do not want the end user to edit the text box to click on them, I just want to make them editable through tabu. this should do the trick public partial category poor text box: Text Box {Safe Override Zero WndProc (Ref: Message Message) {if (m.msg == (Int) WM.LBUTTONDOWN) {Return; // mount down events} base.WndProc (ref m); }} Window message enum can be found. How to do this without anherizing: text box : class EatMouseDown: netwindows {safe override zero WndProc (ref message message) {if (m.msg == (int) WM.LBUTTONDOWN) {return; } Base.WandProc (Ref M); }} Safe Override Zero Onload (EventEurge E) {base.OnLoad (e); How to do this without any part: left a clean part, whatever is important, this can be a buggy but it works R...
Read more