timeout - Haskell -- Forcing strict evaulation with a weird, recursive type -
I asked a question about how to enforce timeliness to enforce strict evaluation. Have Can write a timeout function that determines that some value It appears that You can also do this with NFData (which is not required for more executed: seq / $! Using is maximum time, and deepseq works for anything that is a member of NFData , but what if we use a weird recursive type are doing? Let's say we have the following:
import control. Deepseek Import Control Silence Random Import Data Probably importing system Timeout new type A = A {runA :: A -> Int - & gt; Rand StdGen Bool} - A call to run with it is always example1 :: A example 1 = A (\ ii -> (if i> again see) randomR (True, False) as input and Incorrectly return)) - A call to run with it, as the first input example 2: A will not end with example 2 = A (\ _ _ -> run A example 2 example 2 0) Depends on - Example 1 will end with example 2 or 3 not with example 3: an example 3 = A (\ a _ -> run AA 0) x type A will end within a given time when we runA xx 0 Will you call on? We can try to use it as seq :
testTimeout :: A -> Io (probably Boyle) testtimeout X = timeout 1000 EvalRandIO $! However, this does not work for example2 and example3 because the call is assessed as run A WHNF, but then hangs because The calculation never ends, the same thing will not be compiled with deepseq (i.e. $ !! ), because we have to go to NFData For example Rand is required StdGen bool So, how can we implement this example that the rationale of the strict evaluation / scheduling Somewhere What happens? Or is there any other way to do this? timeout Performs the action in time, as a result Inside is not evaluated. This is right. If we use
(> gt; = (return $!)) Then :: Monad m = & gt; I'm a - & gt; As you know, a type of return creates m a < return $! By doing , we are saying that we do not make m , and therefore complete the result until the action is completed. There is a more functional function here.
evalM m = Results result & lt; - Results of `seq` return result Bool but if you enter [ A] you can do so:
(& gt; & gt; = (return $ !!)) :: (Monad M, NFData A) => I - One -> MA
force mm = result < `Depth` return result
Comments
Post a Comment